Chris Hedges on the cult of the self



20210423T1400−07*

*a link; see a note on notes and links; see also a disclaimer / … and maybe browse or search the post archive*

copied from a footnote to a previous miscellany post:
We have been told a lie … a lie that says progress comes as a result of the efforts of “great” individuals. That lie is used to justify the huge wealth inequity in the world today. The truth is that progress is the result of our ability to cooperate with each other. And it is time that the fruits of that progress be used to help everyone live a dignified life.

—Yuval Noah Harari*

Posted

fiction: the secret of our so-called success

“The secret was probably the appearance of fiction.” —Yuval Noah Harari (!gb)*




20210412T2036−07*

*a link; see a note on notes and links; see also a disclaimer / … and maybe browse or search the post archive*

2021-04-14
closing captions:
We have been told a lie … a lie that says progress comes as a result of the efforts of “great” individuals. That lie is used to justify the huge wealth inequity in the world today. The truth is that progress is the result of our ability to cooperate with each other. And it is time that the fruits of that progress be used to help everyone live a dignified life.

story by Yuval Noah Harari
Posted

sociopathic: all large companies, most large organizations

“All large companies (and indeed most large organisations) are intrinsically sociopathic. When will that penny drop?” —John Naughton (@jnn1), Memex, April 8, 2021*

image source: a Mick Fealty tweet that includes the quote above*

from the NYT op-ed on harassment that the Memex post links to:
As soon as my complaint with H.R. was filed, Google went from being a great workplace to being any other company: It would protect itself first. I’d structured my life around my job — exactly what they wanted me to do — but that only made the fallout worse when I learned that the workplace that I cherished considered me just an employee, one of many and disposable. …

When I didn’t get a promotion, some of my stock grants ran out and so I effectively took a big pay cut. Nevertheless, I wanted to stay at Google. I still believed, despite everything, that Google was the best company in the world. Now I see that my judgment was clouded, but after years of idolizing my workplace, I couldn’t imagine life beyond its walls.

So I interviewed with and got offers from two other top tech companies, hoping that Google would match. In response, Google offered me slightly more money than I was making, but it was still significantly less than my competing offers. I was told that the Google finance office calculated what I was worth to the company. I couldn’t help thinking that this calculus included the complaint I’d filed and the time I’d taken off as a consequence.

I felt I had no choice but to leave, this time for good. Google’s meager counteroffer was final proof that this job was just a job and that I’d be more valued if I went elsewhere.

After I quit, I promised myself to never love a job again. Not in the way I loved Google. Not with the devotion businesses wish to inspire when they provide for employees’ most basic needs like food and health care and belonging. No publicly traded company is a family. I fell for the fantasy that it could be.*


20210409T1450−07*

*a link; see a note on notes and links; see also a disclaimer / … and maybe browse or search the post archive*
Posted

love that has no opposite (Aldous Huxley and Jiddu Krishnamurti)


love that has no opposite is unconditional and universal: no one is excluded – nothing is

this love is nondual, “the reconciliation of opposites in a total understanding and a total love”

Aldous Huxley:
A transcendent spontaneity of life – a creative reality, as Krishnamurti calls it  – reveals itself as immanent only when the perceiver’s mind is in a state of alert passivity, of choiceless awareness. Judgment and comparison commit us irrevocably to duality. Only choiceless awareness can lead to nonduality, to the reconciliation of opposites in a total understanding and a total love. Ama et fac quod vis. (Love and do what you will.) If you love, you may do what you will. But if you start by doing what you will, or by doing what you don’t will in obedience to some traditional system – of notions, ideals, and prohibitions – you will never love. The liberating process must begin with the choiceless awareness of what you will and of your reactions to the symbol system which tells you that you ought, or ought not, to will it. Through this choiceless awareness, as it penetrates the successive layers of the ego and its associated subconscious, will come love and understanding, but of another order than that with which we are ordinarily familiar. This choiceless awareness – at every moment and in all the circumstances of life – is the only effective meditation. All other forms of yoga lead either to the blind thinking which results from self-discipline, or to some kind of self-induced rapture, some form of false samadhi.

Huxley then quotes Krishnamurti as saying this spontaneity … this creative reality … 
is not a gift; it is to be discovered and experienced. It is not an acquisition to be gathered to yourself to glorify yourself. It is a state of being, as silence, in which there is no becoming, in which there is completeness. This creativeness may not necessarily seek expression; it is not a talent that demands outward manifestation. You need not be a great artist or have an audience; if you seek these, you will miss the inward reality. It is neither a gift, nor is it the outcome of talent; it is to be found, this imperishable treasure, where thought frees itself from lust, ill will, and ignorance, where thought frees itself from worldliness and personal craving to be. It is to be experienced through right thinking and meditation.

And he returns to sum up, ending what he has to say by again quoting Krishnamurti, this time on love:

Choiceless self-awareness will bring us to the creative reality which underlies all our destructive make-believes, to the tranquil wisdom which is always there, in spite of ignorance, in spite of the knowledge which is merely ignorance in another form. Knowledge is an affair of symbols and is, all too often, a hindrance to wisdom, to the uncovering of the self from moment to moment. A mind that has come to the stillness of wisdom “shall know being, shall know what it is to love. Love is neither personal nor impersonal. Love is love, not to be defined or described by the mind as exclusive or inclusive. Love is its own eternity; it is the real, the supreme, the immeasurable.”

source: page on the website legacy.jkrishnamurti.org – archived*


20210308T1551−07*

*a link; see a note on notes and links; see also a disclaimer / … and maybe browse or search the post archive*

the immeasurables: love, compassion, joy, and equanimity (!?)
Posted