the Zionist project is coming to an end / Ilan Pappé


posted 2024-03-24 on YouTube*


2024-04-13T21−07*
*asterisks may contain links, as may exclamation points in parentheses (!*)*

the copy-pasted line below appeared first in a draft of thanks and links for 2024-W15

here: Ilan Pappé for 5 minutes / there: an hour on the Zionist project coming to an end*

the asterisk the copy-pasted line ends with links to this post, the one you are reading
Posted

ten theses of secular dharma / Stephen Batchelor

see also After Buddhism :: Stephen Batchelor :: Yale University Press, 2015 / view on Google Books*

… a secular dharma which promotes human flourishing and a culture of awakening needs to be democratic, compassionate and grounded in our everyday life. A secular dharma is both radical in its reconstruction of Buddhism while respectful and appreciative of traditional perspectives and practices.

The ten theses:

#1 - A secular Buddhist is one who is committed to the practice of the dharma for the sake of this world alone.

#2 - The practice of the dharma consists of four tasks: to embrace suffering, let go of reactivity, behold the ceasing of reactivity, and cultivate an integrated way of life.

#3 - All human beings, irrespective of gender, race, sexual orientation, disability, nationality and religion can practice these four tasks. Each person, in each moment, has the potential to be more awake, responsive and free.

#4 - The practice of the dharma is as much concerned with how one speaks, acts and works in the public realm as with how one performs spiritual exercises in private.

#5 - The dharma serves the needs of people at specific times and places. Each form the dharma assumes is a transient human creation, contingent upon the historical, cultural, social and economic conditions that generated it.

#6 - The practitioner honors the dharma teachings that have been passed down through different traditions while seeking to enact them creatively in ways appropriate to the world as it is now.

#7 - The community of practitioners is formed of autonomous persons, who mutually support each other in the cultivation of their paths. In this network of like-minded individuals, members respects the equality of all members while honoring the specific knowledge and expertise each person brings.

#8 - A practitioner is committed to an ethics of care, founded on empathy, compassion and love for all creatures who have evolved on this earth.

#9 - Practitioners seek to understand and diminish the structural violence of societies and institutions as well as the roots of violence that are present in themselves.

#10 - A practitioner of the dharma aspires to nurture a culture of awakening that finds its inspiration in Buddhist and non-Buddhist, religious and secular sources alike.


block quote copied as is from this post on the Secular Buddhist Network (SBN)*


2024-02-15T17−08*
*a link – an asterisk may link to anything (!*) – hover over links for details* / notes below relate to items above

also see on an earlier site a page of posts tagged dharma* … and search this site for dharma (!*)

* * *

“he taught a way of life” / Salzberg, Goenka, Buddha (!?)
/ with a focus on “dukkha and the end of dukkha” (!?)*

* * *

6. The practitioner honors the dharma … in ways appropriate to the world as it is now. / the present*

nothing isn’t dukkha: nothing is perfect, ideal,
complete, beyond change, beyond dependence …

dukkha is reality, and a reaction to it may arise:
to want reality to be other than it is or seems to be

to let go of this reaction lets it cease, revealing
a way of life that treats dukkha with equanimity

* * *

nothing isn’t dukkha / everything is dukkha

you can experience dukkha with equanimity / Zoketsu Norman Fischer (!?)
/ see also the next post, en on: one being – and maybe revisit the present*

* * *

☛ please copy-paste and email any or all of this line and what follows to people you think may thank you

secular dharma: inspired by “Buddhist and non-Buddhist, religious and secular sources alike” and intended for all aspiring to nurture a culture of awakening from the dream of selfhood

“All our ideas of morality and obligation, blame and praise are based on this dream and serve only to strengthen the illusion of its reality.” (!g) / Jacob Needleman on the dream of selfhood (!?)

secular dharma: inspired by “Buddhist and non-Buddhist, religious and secular sources alike” and intended for all aspiring to nurture a culture of awakening (!?)*

thank you for helping “to nurture a culture of awakening” (!?)*

may all be well and do no harm*


*a link – an asterisk may link to anything (!*) – hover over links for details*





Posted

we think it’s normal

like people in abusive relationships think it’s normal


above and below: copy-pasted from work by Caitlin Johnstone here

Westerners who don’t appreciate the extreme dysfunctionality of western civilization are like someone in an abusive marriage who hasn’t yet recognized that there’s a problem, or someone who had a violent and chaotic childhood who still thinks their home life was basically normal.

All of us understand that there are problems with our society, and most of us understand that a lot of of those problems are severe. But few westerners really get just how bad it is. How pervasively diseased it is.

In reality, we are living in a profoundly sick dystopia that is built on a foundation of human corpses and fueled by an endless river of human blood. Our news media are propaganda services, our entertainment is brainwashing, and our mainstream culture is social engineering, all built to keep us turning the gears of a vast globe-dominating empire.

There’s a widespread assumption throughout the western world that while things might not be perfect our society is certainly much better than what people experience in a nation like China, smugly believing ourselves to be a free society full of free thinkers and free people in contrast with those unfortunate thought-controlled communist conformists. In fact western civilization is one giant thought-controlled conformity machine where people’s minds are shaped by mass-scale psychological manipulation far more effectively than anywhere else in the world, exactly because westerners don’t know this is happening and believe they are free.

Western minds don’t like to be told this, because it goes against everything they’ve been trained to believe about their nation, their society, and their world. Obviously we are much freer here than those poor saps to the east; here in the west we are free to choose between 197 flavors of frosted breakfast cereal and 20,000 different superhero movies. We are free to choose between voting for warmongering capitalist authoritarian Democrats or warmongering capitalist authoritarian Republicans. We are free to sell our labor at a fraction of the value it generates to any exploitative ecocidal employer of our choosing. We are free to think whatever thoughts we’ve been trained to think by our education systems, mass media, and Silicon Valley algorithm manipulation. We are free to speak our minds, which have been shaped and conditioned to serve the interests of the powerful and never to say anything that falls outside the Overton window of acceptable opinion.

Sure there are outliers in the margins, westerners who’ve slipped outside the matrix of thought control and have gained the ability to traffick in unauthorized opinions — if you’re reading this you’re probably one of them. But our numbers are deliberately kept too small to have any political consequence, and if those numbers start getting too big for comfort we immediately see influence ops to sow division and confusion and herd people back toward the mainstream flock. Sure we in our small numbers are free to voice unauthorized opinions on marginal platforms where we can’t have much impact — we’re free to dig a hole in the ground and whisper whatever we want into it, too.

The single biggest obstacle to our freedom in the west is our widespread belief that we are free. Until we collectively realize we’re human livestock being continually herded into our respective gear-turning stations to keep the imperial juggernaut trudging ever forward on the world stage, we’ve got no chance to break free and bring the whole abusive system crashing down.

Until this is seen we’re like the wife who thinks it’s perfectly normal that her husband controls all her finances and dictates every aspect of her life, and who’d be shocked and angered if anyone tried to tell her that this is what an abusive relationship looks like. We’re like the man who insists he had a happy childhood despite remembering a lot of body trauma and screams.

The truth is all around us — we’re marinating in it 24/7/365. But we can’t see it, because it’s all we’ve ever known. We’ve been conditioned to think that this murderous ecocidal mind-controlled dystopia is normal, and we can’t imagine it being any other way. The prospect of ending it can actually feel scary and intimidating, just as it can for someone who’s thinking about fleeing an abusive relationship.

But real freedom is just on the other side of that fear. All we’ve got to do is become sufficiently conscious of what’s really going on here.

20240215T10−08*
*a link; see a note on notes and links and a disclaimer; see also the about post and the archives of miscellany, notrehta, or fw posts

Meanwhile the ruling oligarchy and its highly trained elite of soldiers, policemen, thought-manufacturers and mind-manipulators will quietly run the show as they see fit.
Aldous Huxley in 1958
Posted

mind-bending

In the beginning was Napoleon*

Adam Tooze:

If the period between 1790s and the early 1800s was, according to Reinhart Koselleck, the period in which the modern Western conception of secular history took shape (Sattelzeit), then Napoleon was perhaps its first hero (or antihero). If there was such a thing as history, then Napoleon showed how war and military command could make and remake it.

Not for nothing, Hegel described the emperor cantering through Jena as the “world soul” on horseback. It was the historical efficacy of Napoleonic war-fighting that Prussian theorist of war, Clausewitz, tried to grasp with his radically historical and romantic view of war as an antidote to the rationalist and geometric conceptions of war beloved of the 18th century.

One hundred and eighty years later, the historian Thomas Nipperdey began his history of 19th-century Germany with the simple statement: In the beginning was Napoleon.*


20231203T1741Z*
*a link; see a note on notes and links and a disclaimer; see also the about post and the archives of miscellany, notrehta, or fw posts



Posted