/ raise, not beg; (asking for a friend); colon introduces direct question; no quotation marks; 11-15
/ raise, not beg; (asking for a friend); colon introduces direct question; no quotation marks; 11-15
Absolutely right. We don't need Podemos; we need a people-powered, Podemos-style media insurrection challenging the 'MSM':
— Media Lens (@medialens) November 12, 2020
'We can reclaim politics – a politics that cares about the future, about our species, about our planet – but to do so we must first reclaim our minds.' https://t.co/fN31ruKKmS
Today’s globalised wealth elite prefer neoliberal, technocratic politics that keep borders open for trade; that treat the labouring poor as human chattel, to be moved around on a global chess board as a way to force wages down; and that ensure the elite can stash its ill-gotten gains away on island sanctuaries far from the tax man.
But when technocratic politics is on its death bed, as it is now, the corporate elite will always settle for the populism of a Trump or a Farage over the populism of the left. They will do so even if rightwing populism risks constraining their financial empires, because leftwing populism does much worse: it upends the warped logic on which the corporate elite’s entire hoarded wealth depends, threatening to wipe it out.
If the corporate elite can no longer find a way to foist a neoliberal technocrat like Biden on the public, they will choose the populism of a Trump over the populism of Sanders every time. And as they own the media, they can craft the stories we hear: about who we are, what is possible and where we are heading. If we allow it, our imaginations will be twisted and deformed in the image of the deranged totem they choose.
We can reclaim politics – a politics that cares about the future, about our species, about our planet – but to do so we must first reclaim our minds.
from cached article*
Glenn,
— Tony Figs (@TonyFigs3) November 5, 2020
Your Tweet is exactly what Chris Hedges is saying in this article he wrote today - https://t.co/8IqeHgZwSJ
The Democrats and their liberal apologists are, the election has illustrated, oblivious to the profound personal and economic despair sweeping through this country. They stand for nothing. They fight for nothing. Restoring the rule of law, universal health care, banning fracking, a Green New Deal, the protection of civil liberties, the building of unions, the preservation and expansion of social welfare programs, a moratorium on evictions and foreclosures, the forgiveness of student debt, stiff environmental controls, a government jobs program and guaranteed income, financial regulation, opposition to endless war and military adventurism were once again forgotten. Championing these issues would have resulted in a Democratic Party landslide. But since the Democratic Party is a wholly owned subsidiary of corporate donors, promoting any policy that might foster the common good, diminish corporate profits and restore democracy, including imposing campaign finance laws, was impossible. Biden’s campaign was utterly bereft of ideas and policy issues, as if he and the Democrats could sweep the elections by promising to save the soul of America. At least the neofascists have the courage of their demented convictions.*
In a word, Shakespeare’s plays were not written by Shakespeare, nor even by Bacon or the Earl of Oxford; they were written by Elizabethan England.*
If you owe the bank $100, that's your problem. If you owe the bank $100 million, that's the bank's problem. If you are the President of the United States... what kind of problem is that?
— Stephen Foley (@stephenfoley) October 26, 2020
All the president’s debts: to whom Donald Trump owes money https://t.co/tbQj40byaa
The situation is made more pressing for the US president because his primary source of income in recent years — his work on television — “is drying up”, according to an investigation by The New York Times. Citing the president’s tax filings, the Times also said much of that income was invested in golf courses that are money losers. So while the president is asset-rich, it is unclear how much liquidity he has access to.
The Trump Organization declined to comment.
The president’s creditors can be broken into five groups. . . .*
“How is it that we can be told, and believe, that we are the richest country in history, and at the same time that we cannot share benefits our grandparents enjoyed? When did we become too poor to welcome immigrants?” https://t.co/abmWBtfdAO
— Rob Fischer (@RPFischer) June 19, 2020
The prestige of what was until very lately the world economic order lingers on despite the fact that the system itself is now revealed as a tenuous set of arrangements that have been highly profitable for some people but gravely damaging to the world.*
I always say to people -- on the road, Basra in '91, I saw women, as well as soldiers and civilians, old men, torn apart by British bombs as well as American. And dogs were tearing them to pieces to eat, it was lunchtime in the desert. I tell you, if you saw what I saw you'd never support a war again. But you won't show that on television. And by not showing that on television we present the world with a bloodless sand pit. We pretend war is not that bad. It's "surgical," always "surgical strikes." Surgery's a place where you're cured in the hospital, not where you're murdered or killed or torn apart. Thus, we make it easier for our leaders -- our generals, our prime ministers, our presidents -- to sell us war, and for us to buy into war and go along with that. That makes us lethally culpable and potentially war criminals in a very moral sense of the word -- or immoral sense, I should say.*
Caitlin Johnstone on going independent: "The audiences will be there. Truth is attractive to people, serving power is not."
— FiveFilters.org ⏳ (@fivefilters) October 30, 2020
Greenwald's Intercept Resignation Exposes The Rot In All Mass Media - @caitoz
Read more here: https://t.co/iMDBGC4szY pic.twitter.com/YRD1XP8S3A