neoliberalism explained (George Monbiot)

see copy of original article, archived*


2021-12-29T21:14−08* / at the about* post – at bit.ly/dateposted – anyone can link to this post from its date: December 19, 2021
*a link – or not; see a note on notes and links and a disclaimer / … and maybe browse or search the archive*

invisible power (!*)

a self-regulated market: “a competitive sporting event without a referee” (!gb) / Bernard Harcourt
Posted

why there is still no peace on earth (David Stockman)



see article by David Stockman from his website – archived*


2021-12-28T14:19−08* / at the about* post – at bit.ly/dateposted – anyone can link to this post from its date: December 28, 2021
*a link – or not; see a note on notes and links and a disclaimer / … and maybe browse or search the archive*

!?  “Berlin wall fell in November 1989” site:antiwar.com / articles by David Stockman with this phrase each year, 2017–21


Posted

Noam Chomsky: “China is not a military threat. The military threat is against China.”

image from Twitter*



Kishore Mahbubani, former president of the UN Security Council, in an interview from 2020:
I quote a former American ambassador to China, Stapleton Roy, who told me, ‘Kishore, when Xi Jinping made an offer to demilitarize the South China Sea, America should have grabbed that offer and agreed to stop all our military activities in the South China Sea. That would have pushed the Chinese out.’ Of course, the Americans would be out too. But the South China Sea is much more important to China than it is to America. If America steps out, the Chinese military steps out. And that’s a win for America, right? Instead, the U.S. Navy responded by sending naval vessels. So Xi said, ‘Okay. You reject my offer. So be it.’*

Noam Chomsky, October 2021:
China is not a military threat. The military threat is against China. China is ringed with US bases with nuclear armed missiles, right offshore, aimed at China. It’s China that’s under threat. Not the United States.*


2021-12-19T21:49−08* / at the about* post – at bit.ly/dateposted – anyone can link to this post from its date: December 19, 2021
*a link – or not; see a note on notes and links and a disclaimer / … and maybe browse or search the archive*

Posted

the real disinformation agents: NBC tells four lies in two minutes


source: article (transcript) on Substack*


2021-12-17T21:24−08* / at the about* post – at bit.ly/dateposted – anyone can link to this post from its date: December 17, 2021
*a link – or not; see a note on notes and links and a disclaimer / … and maybe browse or search the archive*

power does untold harm to people and the planet, and gets away with it by manufacturing consent

power decides what happens and decides what people think about what happens: “the narrative”

this is only going to get worse until people start to wake up and focus on understanding power (!*)

Posted

maybe not the best response to the existential threats we all face


Lockheed has promoted the F-35 in washrooms and bus stops where politicians and DND officials congregate. A bus shelter in front of Parliament Hill recently declared, “F35: Seats one. Employs thousands.”*


2021-12-11T15:45−08* / at the about* post – at bit.ly/dateposted – anyone can link to this post from its date: December 11, 2021
*a link – or not; see a note on notes and links and a disclaimer / … and maybe browse or search the archive*
Posted

environmentalists vote against their own interests … with support from fossil fuel companies


see tweeted article, archived*

Reuters:
The fight for votes cost both sides almost a combined $100 million, making it the most expensive referendum question in Maine’s history.

The project was proposed in Maine in 2017 after a previous proposal to run a transmission line through New Hampshire was blocked by local opposition. It received a series of state and federal permits from 2019 to 2021 and began construction early this year.*


2021-12-02T10:13−08* / at the about* post – at bit.ly/dateposted – anyone can link to this post from its date: December 00, 2021
*a link – or not; see a note on notes and links and a disclaimer / … and maybe browse or search the archive*
Posted

seven rules for our best chance to survive climate change (Andrew Nikiforuk)

image credit: see cached article*

Andrew Nikiforuk:

We have entered a new era that demands we embrace these seven transformative truths:

  1. Complexity delivers diminishing returns
  2. Not acting early ups the eventual cost
  3. Growth equals emissions
  4. Governments learn from punishments meted by voters, not nature
  5. The coming catastrophes will victimize those least powerful
  6. Anti-fragility should be the new goal
  7. More data doesn’t lead to better decisions


2021-11-25T21:05−08* / at the about* post – at bit.ly/dateposted – anyone can link to this post from its date: November 25, 2021
*a link – or not; see a note on notes and links and a disclaimer / … and maybe browse or search the archive*


image original* / see also National Observer newsletter*
Posted

Noam Chomsky: interview by Eftertryk Magazine, October 2021


Eftertryk Magazine interviewed Noam Chomsky on four issues:
  1. The justification for the Afghanistan war in the immediate wake of 9/11
  2. AUKUS and the new cold war with China
  3. The climate crisis
  4. The principles and values of socialist anarchism
see also: edited transcript in a Jacobin article, archived*


2021-11-19T21:25−08* / at the about* post – at bit.ly/dateposted – anyone can link to this post from its date: November 19, 2021
*a link – or not; see a note on notes and links and a disclaimer / … and maybe browse or search the archive*

Chomsky, from the transcript:
any form of hierarchy and domination is illegitimate unless it can justify itself*
/ in very rare cases it can; if it can’t, dismantle it for “a more free, participatory, cooperative society" – aka a “mainstream” anarchist system
An anarchist system could very well have hierarchy, as long as it’s controlled from below. Like, if I need surgery, I go to a doctor, not a carpenter. That’s hierarchy. But I chose it – he’s a doctor by virtue of my decision, our decision collectively, that some group of people can gain skills that the community needs. So, as long as responsibility is vested in the democratic participatory community in every institution, in the workplace, in communities everywhere, then we’re moving toward a free and just society.

It will be a highly organized society. There can be a lot of planning about how we should distribute resources, what our policies ought to be. It could be, or should be, international in scope. So, a rich and complex organization based on popular and democratic control, meeting the condition that any form of hierarchy that can’t justify itself has to be dismantled in favor of more freedom. Then you can spell that out in many detailed ways.
Posted