#GfLconf17 see the slides from Rachel Fenichel's Blockly session https://t.co/s9Wv2nSEdT
— NZCER (@NZCER) September 1, 2017
see also:
!g Blockly
#GfLconf17 see the slides from Rachel Fenichel's Blockly session https://t.co/s9Wv2nSEdT
— NZCER (@NZCER) September 1, 2017
“… poverty is about the way society is organised, not about the failings or bad luck of the poor” https://t.co/S9qpwvSG1h
— George Atherton (@notrehta) October 19, 2017
Sometimes we as a society forget what we already learned. That poverty isn't a moral failing is one of them. https://t.co/vj7G6gu0ms #UBI pic.twitter.com/pRSj1FdpyE
— Scott Santens (@scottsantens) October 18, 2017
copied as is (no hyphen, no quotes) #editing #OED pic.twitter.com/2NZ589NtpD
— George Atherton (@notrehta) October 18, 2017
The true meaning of life is to plant trees under whose shade you do not expect to sit.
Hedges/Lakey: nonviolent resistance in the US now and in pre-WWII Norway and Sweden https://t.co/dZX811WF4S origin of Nordic economic model pic.twitter.com/38f6PuKZzH
— George Atherton (@notrehta) October 16, 2017
“It puts more pressure on the state—which is presided over by the 1 percent—to step in more and more forcefully, with the middle class saying, ‘We care about order. We don’t want chaos,’ ” he said. “That’s what happened in Germany. It was a strengthening of the state. This happened in Italy as well. That’s what the game plan was for fascists in Norway and Sweden. It didn’t work. It didn’t work because the left didn’t play their game. They didn’t allow themselves to be baited into paying attention to them, doing street fighting.”
“Instead, [what was done] in the civil rights movement we would have called ‘they kept their eyes on the prize,’ ” Lakey said. “They knew the prize was to push away the economic elite, get rid of its dominance, so they can set up a new economic system, which is now called the Nordic model. What they did was: massive strikes, massive boycotts, massive demonstrations. Not only in the urban areas, which is what you expect, but also in the rural areas. During the Depression [in Sweden and Norway], there were lots of farmers who had their farms foreclosed on. Farmers are perennially in debt and had no way of repaying that debt. When the sheriff came, farmers in that county would come to join them and collectively not cooperate—not violently, but very strongly—in such a way that the sheriff couldn’t carry out the auction.”
“Remember who is actually running things, and we keep our focus on them both politically and economically,” Lakey said.
The body's reaction to #Opioids is making drugs like #Fentanyl highly dangerous. #Rehab https://t.co/Gmc3S4IKJw pic.twitter.com/e9pZpCByR3
— Evan Jarschauer (@careplanpro) September 9, 2017
Fentanyl is a powerful pain-relieving drug, 50 times more potent than morphine, and was originally synthesised by Belgian chemist Paul Jannsen. The drug has medical applications, for example, in anaesthesia and relieving pain from major surgery or cancer.
The drug interacts with the same opioid receptors as morphine and heroin and is therefore called an opioid, even though it is chemically unrelated to opiates (drugs derived from opium poppies). Opioid receptors are part of the body’s reward pathway. Chemicals are released in our body to make us feel good as a reward for activities that help us survive and procreate, such as eating, drinking and sex. Increasing the presence of feelgood chemicals in our body is why opiates and opioids can be so powerfully addictive.
see also:
It's time to find a safer way to manage pain. Check out these facts about America's #opioid epidemic: #Rehab https://t.co/G5RuWlBuPA pic.twitter.com/vsMTSG0P8m
— Evan Jarschauer (@careplanpro) October 12, 2017
Or, as Isaiah Berlin said, "freedom for the pike is death for the minnows". https://t.co/yeU4rDucW5
— GeorgeMonbiot (@GeorgeMonbiot) June 15, 2017
Last week, on an internet radio channel called The Fifth Column, I debated climate change with Claire Fox of the Institute of Ideas, one of the rightwing libertarian groups that rose from the ashes of the Revolutionary Communist party. Fox is a feared interrogator on the BBC show The Moral Maze. Yet when I asked her a simple question – "do you accept that some people's freedoms intrude upon other people's freedoms?" – I saw an ideology shatter like a windscreen. I used the example of a Romanian lead-smelting plant I had visited in 2000, whose freedom to pollute is shortening the lives of its neighbours. Surely the plant should be regulated in order to enhance the negative freedoms – freedom from pollution, freedom from poisoning – of its neighbours? She tried several times to answer it, but nothing coherent emerged which would not send her crashing through the mirror of her philosophy.
Modern libertarianism is the disguise adopted by those who wish to exploit without restraint. It pretends that only the state intrudes on our liberties. It ignores the role of banks, corporations and the rich in making us less free. It denies the need for the state to curb them in order to protect the freedoms of weaker people. This bastardised, one-eyed philosophy is a con trick, whose promoters attempt to wrongfoot justice by pitching it against liberty. By this means they have turned "freedom" into an instrument of oppression.
see full article, linked to in tweet, and see especially reference to Isaiah Berlin essay: Two Concepts of Liberty
Why I've never carried an iPhone. https://t.co/JvPeWSMCAP
— Paul Graham (@paulg) October 7, 2017
Even when you have the luxury of 4,000 words you end up cutting important stuff. Neil Postman on Orwell and Huxley: https://t.co/LzGuCY0I04 pic.twitter.com/11j45GBFDG
— Paul Lewis (@PaulLewis) October 6, 2017
Quote comes from Amusing Ourselves to Death, a book that is more relevant today than when it was published in 1985.
— Paul Lewis (@PaulLewis) October 6, 2017
The book recommendation, and much of the thinking behind the article, comes from ex-Googler turned brilliant ethicist @WilliamsJames_.
— Paul Lewis (@PaulLewis) October 6, 2017
Foreign Minister Chrystia Freeland stressed “the need for the rest of us to set our own clear and sovereign course.” https://t.co/yYm486Tlu9
— George Atherton (@notrehta) September 30, 2017
There are many reasons to be appalled by President Trump, including his disregard for constitutional norms and decent behavior. But watching this unlikeliest of presidents strut on the treacherous stage of international politics is different from following the daily domestic chaos that is the Trump administration. Hearing him bully and brag, boast and bluster, threaten and lie, one feels a kind of dizziness, a sensation that underneath the throbbing pulse of routine scandal lies the potential for much worse. The kind of sensation, in fact, that accompanies dangerously high blood pressure, just before a sudden, excruciating pain.