“man differs from other animals in one very important respect, and that is that he has some desires which … can never be fully gratified, and which would keep him restless even in Paradise”
— George Atherton (@notrehta) March 10, 2020
“acquisitiveness, rivalry, vanity, and love of power”
—Bertrand Russell, Nobel lecture* pic.twitter.com/um35LUPvps
“acquisitiveness, rivalry, vanity, and love of power” (!g)
Acquisitiveness – the wish to possess as much as possible of goods, or the title to goods – is a motive which, … although it is the mainspring of the capitalist system, is by no means the most powerful of the motives that survive the conquest of hunger. Rivalry is a much stronger motive. … Vanity is a motive of immense potency. … Love of power is greatly increased by the experience of power, and this applies to petty power as well as to that of potentates. … Alcibiades … Napoleon … Such men, however, are not quite pure examples, since they also derive immense satisfaction from vanity. The purest type is that of the eminence grise – the power behind the throne that never appears in public, and merely hugs itself with the secret thought: «How little these puppets know who is pulling the strings.» Baron Holstein, who controlled the foreign policy of the German Empire from 1890 to 1906, illustrates this type to perfection. He lived in a slum; he never appeared in society; he avoided meeting the Emperor, except on one single occasion when the Emperor’s importunity could not be resisted; he refused all invitations to Court functions, on the ground that he possessed no court dress. He had acquired secrets which enabled him to blackmail the Chancellor and many of the Kaiser’s intimates. He used the power of blackmail, not to acquire wealth, or fame, or any other obvious advantage, but merely to compel the adoption of the foreign policy he preferred.
https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/literature/1950/russell/lecture/
!gi Tenniel: “Dropping the Pilot” / March 1890 cartoon on the forced resignation of Otto von Bismarck (!?)
Jonathan Cook, a British-Israeli journalist and former Guardian employee who now works freelance, makes the point Bertrand Russell made 70 years ago: visible power is vulnerable, invisible power is not.
“As I pointed out in my previous post, the establishment’s power derives from its invisibility. Scrutiny is kryptonite to power.” —Jonathan Cook, here
“Understanding power and overcoming it through that understanding is the only path to liberation we can take as individuals, as societies, and as a species.” —Jonathan Cook, here
*an asterisk here shows that the about post links to this post
